Skip to main content

Edge's News: Russian Billionaire Roman Abramovich is Trying to Sell off Chelsea amid fear of Sanction

Roman Abramovich could struggle to find a buyer for Chelsea after it emerged that the new owners would face a £2.2bn bill to redevelop Stamford Bridge on top of the Russian’s £4bn asking price for the club.


The club has been put up for sale by Abramovich, who is fearing sanctions from the UK government following Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.


Abramovich has pumped almost £1.5bn into the club since taking charge in 2003 and he wants to recoup that cash on top of his valuation of the Blues.


That asking price alone could be too much for most potential buyers already but the Daily Mail claim the work needed on Stamford Bridge has further complicated matters.


Chelsea have twice attempted to move away from Stamford Bridge but failed with attempts to move to Earl’s Court and Battersea.


The club therefore decided to stay at Stamford Bridge, opting instead to modernise the stadium on the same site.


Chelsea applied for planning permission in 2017 but the plans were shelved in 2018, with the club citing the poor financial landscape as the wrong time to undergo the operation.


That, of course, has only been heightened by the pandemic but the estimation at the time was that the work would cost around £1.4bn to build the 60,000-seater stadium.


But those costs have soared to an eye-watering £2.2bn – an astonishing £800m rise on previous estimates.


This is because the Blues would have to have a three-year tenancy at Wembley during the build of the new stadium, which has soared in price due to infrastructure costs increasing.


That, combined with the £4bn that Abramovich is demanding, would price out most buyers and means it would be at least a decade before the new investors could see a return on their money.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The FCT Minister–Soldier Standoff: A Test of Civil Authority and the Rule of Law

On November 11, 2025, Nigerians watched in disbelief as a video surfaced showing a tense confrontation between the Minister of the Federal Capital Territory, Nyesom Wike, and a group of armed soldiers who blocked his convoy from accessing a disputed piece of land in Gaduwa, Abuja. The incident, brief but dramatic, was more than a moment of political theatre. It struck at the heart of a much bigger issue — the place of the military in a democracy, and the sanctity of civilian authority under the Nigerian Constitution. The Legal Position: Who Was Right? The Minister’s Authority Under Section 302 of the 1999 Constitution and the FCT Act , the Minister of the Federal Capital Territory exercises the executive powers of the President within Abuja. That means the Minister is not just a political appointee — he represents federal executive authority . His duties include overseeing land allocation, urban planning, and the enforcement of development control through the Federal Capital T...

Nigeria: On the Right of Self-Defence and Protection of National Sovereignty

The Federal Republic of Nigeria reaffirms its unwavering commitment to the purposes and principles of the Charter of the United Nations, in particular the maintenance of international peace and security, the respect for the sovereignty and political independence of all States, and the peaceful settlement of disputes. Nigeria is a sovereign and independent nation. Our Constitution vests sovereignty in the people of Nigeria and mandates the Government to protect the territorial integrity and independence of our country. This sovereignty—recognised under international law and reaffirmed by our membership in the United Nations, the African Union, and the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS)—is inviolable. The Government of Nigeria has observed with grave concern recent statements and actions that amount to a threat of aggression and possible violation of our territorial integrity. We remind all States that any such threat or use of force contravenes Article 2(4) of the Ch...

Kebbi’s 3 a.m. Withdrawal Shows Why President Tinubu’s Security Reforms Can’t Wait

When Governor Nasir Idris of Kebbi State revealed that security personnel deployed to vulnerable communities were withdrawn at 3:00 a.m.—just 45 minutes before an attack—Nigerians reacted with shock, anger, and a single question that refuses to disappear: Who gave the withdrawal order? It is a fair question. It is also one that may take time, investigation, and institutional honesty to answer. But the Kebbi incident exposes a deeper truth about security management in Nigeria: our command structure is too fragmented for a country battling multi-layered threats. And this, more than anything, validates President Bola Ahmed Tinubu’s push for a centralised, technology-driven, and accountable security coordination model. Nigeria’s security agencies—military, police, DSS, civil defence, intelligence units—operate in parallel lanes with overlapping mandates. State governors, despite bearing the title “Chief Security Officer,” have no legal authority over federal forces. This incoheren...