The FCT Minister–Soldier Standoff: A Test of Civil Authority and the Rule of Law

-


On November 11, 2025, Nigerians watched in disbelief as a video surfaced showing a tense confrontation between the Minister of the Federal Capital Territory, Nyesom Wike, and a group of armed soldiers who blocked his convoy from accessing a disputed piece of land in Gaduwa, Abuja.

The incident, brief but dramatic, was more than a moment of political theatre. It struck at the heart of a much bigger issue — the place of the military in a democracy, and the sanctity of civilian authority under the Nigerian Constitution.


The Legal Position: Who Was Right?

The Minister’s Authority

Under Section 302 of the 1999 Constitution and the FCT Act, the Minister of the Federal Capital Territory exercises the executive powers of the President within Abuja.
That means the Minister is not just a political appointee — he represents federal executive authority.

His duties include overseeing land allocation, urban planning, and the enforcement of development control through the Federal Capital Territory Administration (FCTA).

So, when Wike and his team visited the Gaduwa site to inspect what they described as unauthorised development, they were acting squarely within the law.


The Soldiers’ Role

The Nigerian Armed Forces operate under Sections 217–220 of the Constitution and the Armed Forces Act.
Their duties are clear:

  1. Defend Nigeria from external aggression.
  2. Maintain territorial integrity.
  3. Suppress insurrection and assist civil authorities only when called upon by the President.

Guarding or obstructing access to a private land dispute is not part of those duties.
If the soldiers were deployed at the instance of a private individual — even a former military chief — then their actions were illegal and unconstitutional.


When the Military Blocks Civil Authority

In a democracy, the military is subordinate to civilian power. The President is the Commander-in-Chief, and ministers act under his delegated authority.


Therefore, when soldiers refused to let the FCT Minister perform his duty, they were not just defying Wike — they were disobeying the civil authority of the Federal Republic of Nigeria.

Under Section 36 of the Armed Forces Act, such defiance amounts to insubordination and could attract severe disciplinary sanctions.


Why This Matters — Beyond Abuja

This episode sends a troubling message both to Nigerians and the international community.


A soldier confronting a federal minister on official duty suggests weak institutional control, abuse of military power, and erosion of democratic norms.


It undermines the rule of law and fuels the perception that certain individuals can use the military to protect private interests — a narrative Nigeria has been struggling to move away from since its return to democracy in 1999.


The Way Forward

To preserve confidence in governance and protect the integrity of Nigeria’s institutions:

  • The Defence Headquarters must investigate who ordered the deployment.
  • Any officer found guilty of misusing military personnel should face disciplinary action.
  • The FCTA should continue enforcing land regulations without fear or political interference.
  • Above all, both civilians and military officers must remember that the Constitution, not the gun, defines authority in a democracy.


My Edge

This standoff is not merely about a plot of land in Gaduwa, it’s a reminder that the rule of law must always stand above personal power.
When soldiers can stand in the way of a federal minister, democracy itself stands on shaky ground.
Nigeria’s progress depends on restoring and protecting the simple truth that civil authority is supreme — always.






Comments

  1. AnonymousNovember 12, 2025 at 11:58 AM

    “The duty of the military is to defend the nation, not to interfere in land matters.”

    ReplyDelete
  2. AnonymousNovember 12, 2025 at 12:44 PM

    Firstly I think the government should investigate and disciplined the officer for breaking the law. Secondly why is the military officer involved with the land issue all this must be look into.

    ReplyDelete
  3. AnonymousNovember 12, 2025 at 4:38 PM

    The government stood by and allowed people to occupy and build on the land for years — it’s unrealistic to now expect the owners to simply accept the seizure of their land or properties after investing so much.

    On the other hand, any military personnel who acquired land or property without proper due diligence or valid documentation are also at fault.

    In the end, both parties share the blame for this situation and neither can fully justify their actions.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Disclaimer
Comments expressed here do not reflect the opinions, thoughts, ideas and feelings of https://www.edgeofdworld.com or any employee thereof

Popular posts from this blog

President Bola Ahmed Tinubu Tax Reform

-
Image
President Bola Tinubu’s tax reform bills have sparked a lively debate in Nigeria. Many experts believe that if implemented effectively, these reforms could significantly benefit the country and its citizens. The proposed reforms aim to lay the foundation for Nigeria’s fiscal policy and are based on recommendations from the Taiwo Oyedele led Presidential Committee on Fiscal Policy and Tax Reforms. Key Provisions of the Tax Reform Bills The tax reform bills introduce several key changes to Nigeria’s tax laws. Among the notable provisions are: 🔴 Tax Exemption for Low-Income Earners : The proposed Nigeria Tax Bill offers tax relief to average Nigerian salary earners by exempting individuals earning below N800,000 per year from paying taxes. 🔴 Reduced Tax Rates for Small Businesses : The bill also proposes to exempt small businesses with annual incomes below N25 million from paying profit taxes. Additionally, the top profit tax rate for larger companies would be reduced from 30% to ...
Continue Reading »

Could President Trump issue an executive order to abolish birthright citizenship?

-
Image
President Donald Trump’s recent claims that he has the authority to end birthright citizenship through an executive order have sparked a heated debate. However, most constitutional scholars argue that such an action would be unconstitutional and likely to face legal challenges. *The 14th Amendment* The 14th Amendment to the United States Constitution, ratified in 1868, explicitly states that “all persons born or naturalised in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside” ¹. This amendment was initially intended to grant citizenship to recently freed slaves, but it has also been interpreted to confer birthright citizenship on anyone born on American soil. *Supreme Court Precedents* The Supreme Court has consistently upheld the birthright citizenship provision of the 14th Amendment in numerous cases. In United States v. Wong Kim Ark (1898), the court ruled that a child born in the United States to Chin...
Continue Reading »

President Tinubu’s Bold Economic Reforms: Two Years of Progress and Renewed Hope

-
Image
When President Bola Ahmed Tinubu assumed office, he inherited an economy weighed down by heavy subsidies, low oil production, dwindling reserves, and widespread investor distrust. Many believed the challenges were insurmountable. Yet, just two years into his administration, the economic indicators tell a powerful story of resilience, tough choices, and steady progress. The reforms have not been without pain, but they reflect a deliberate strategy: dismantling old structures that held Nigeria back and laying a foundation for lasting prosperity. From Deficit to Surplus: Reversing Nigeria’s Trade Balance In Q1 2023, Nigeria recorded a ₦20 billion trade deficit . Two years later, the country now boasts a ₦5.7 trillion surplus . This dramatic turnaround reflects improved oil exports, reduced importation of refined products, and stronger non-oil contributions. This surplus is more than a statistic — it shows Nigeria is regaining control of its economy and reducing reliance on foreign de...
Continue Reading »

President Tinubu’s NELFUND: Giving Every Student a Chance

-
Image
President Tinubu’s NELFUND: Giving Every Student a Chance “How a son of nobody and who knows nobody can access the loan freely.” Education is the foundation of progress, yet for many Nigerian students, financial barriers have been a roadblock to achieving their dreams. Recognising this, President Bola Ahmed Tinubu launched the Nigeria Education Loan Fund (NELFUND) — a visionary initiative designed to ensure that no student is left behind because of financial constraints . The heart of NELFUND is simple: it levels the playing field. Whether you come from a well-connected family or from humble beginnings, the fund is built to make sure that every Nigerian student has access to education loans without discrimination, delays, or unnecessary bureaucracy. This is why the slogan resonates so strongly: “How a son of nobody and who knows nobody can access the loan freely.” It speaks directly to millions of young Nigerians who have talent, ambition, and drive—but lack the financial su...
Continue Reading »

Bola Ahmed Tinubu GCFR President of the Federal Republic of Nigeria has hit the ground running.....

-
Image
Key takeaway points of the President’s Speech — the declaration of the end of fuel subsidy   —the reintroduction of commodity board — the immediate mandate on the CBN on the achievement of a Unified Exchange Rate and assured house cleaning at the CBN — re-evaluation of the high interest rates that is anti-investment  — focus on infrastructural development to facilitate job creation  — exponential effort on electricity generation, transmission and distribution with the participation of state governments.  — holistic review of all anti-investment and multiple taxation policies.  —the immediate facilitation of repatriation of investment and profits.  —Agricultural Revolution and the full implementation of the “Agbado Policy” 
Continue Reading »