Skip to main content

Edge's News: UK Police investigates Prince Charles’ Foundation over cash-for-honours scandal

The British Met Police on Wednesday launched a probe into the charity foundation of Prince of Wales and heir apparent to British throne, Prince Charles over cash-for-honours scandal.


The investigation follows allegations that a Saudi billionaire who donated money to the Prince’s Foundation was offered help to secure knighthood and citizenship.


According to media reports, Scotland Yard who disclosed this in a statement on Wednesday, 16 February 2022, said there have been no arrests or interviews under caution.


The Metropolitan Police said in a statement: “The Metropolitan Police Service has launched an investigation into allegations of offences under the Honours (Prevention of Abuses) Act 1925.


“The decision follows an assessment of a September 2021 letter. This related to media reporting alleging offers of help were made to secure honours and citizenship for a Saudi national.


“The Special Enquiry Team has conducted the assessment process which has included contacting those believed to hold relevant information.


“Officers liaised with The Prince’s Foundation about the findings of an independent investigation into fundraising practices. The Foundation provided a number of relevant documents.


“These documents were reviewed alongside existing information. The assessment determined an investigation will commence.


“There have been no arrests or interviews under caution.”

The latest development is a marked change from the Met’s position three months ago, when the former police chief, Cressida Dick, said they had no plans to investigate the matter.


Clarence House has previously said Charles has “no knowledge” of the alleged honours and citizenship controversy as he was not aware of the alleged offer on the basis of donations.


The Spokesman for the British royal residence said, “No request to question the royal has been made. Royal insiders say it’s the charity, rather than Charles himself, under investigation.”


Michael Fawcett, the Chief Executive of the Foundation and one of the prince’s closest aides, had initially stepped down from his duties in October following newspaper revelations about his links to the Saudi businessman, Mahfouz Marei Mubarak Bin Mahfouz, who had donated large sums of money to restoration projects of particular interest to Charles.


Fawcett is alleged to have coordinated work to grant a royal honour and even UK citizenship for Mahfouz.


A spokesman for Clarence House said: “The Prince of Wales has no knowledge of the alleged offer of honours or British citizenship on the basis of donations to his charities. There is no request [from police for interview.


“If His Royal Highness was asked to help he would of course do so.”

Scotland Yard detectives are said to be looking into allegations relating to Michael Fawcett.


Prince Charles’ Foundation helps jobless people get back into work and start small businesses. Officers have already spoken with The Prince’s Foundation about the findings of an independent investigation into their fundraising. 


That first probe, carried out by auditing firm Ernst & Young, found that Mr Fawcett was alleged to be involved in directing money from the donor’s foundation to another charity of which Charles was patron. Charles is president of the foundation but not involved with its governance of day-to-day activities.




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The FCT Minister–Soldier Standoff: A Test of Civil Authority and the Rule of Law

On November 11, 2025, Nigerians watched in disbelief as a video surfaced showing a tense confrontation between the Minister of the Federal Capital Territory, Nyesom Wike, and a group of armed soldiers who blocked his convoy from accessing a disputed piece of land in Gaduwa, Abuja. The incident, brief but dramatic, was more than a moment of political theatre. It struck at the heart of a much bigger issue — the place of the military in a democracy, and the sanctity of civilian authority under the Nigerian Constitution. The Legal Position: Who Was Right? The Minister’s Authority Under Section 302 of the 1999 Constitution and the FCT Act , the Minister of the Federal Capital Territory exercises the executive powers of the President within Abuja. That means the Minister is not just a political appointee — he represents federal executive authority . His duties include overseeing land allocation, urban planning, and the enforcement of development control through the Federal Capital T...

Nigeria: On the Right of Self-Defence and Protection of National Sovereignty

The Federal Republic of Nigeria reaffirms its unwavering commitment to the purposes and principles of the Charter of the United Nations, in particular the maintenance of international peace and security, the respect for the sovereignty and political independence of all States, and the peaceful settlement of disputes. Nigeria is a sovereign and independent nation. Our Constitution vests sovereignty in the people of Nigeria and mandates the Government to protect the territorial integrity and independence of our country. This sovereignty—recognised under international law and reaffirmed by our membership in the United Nations, the African Union, and the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS)—is inviolable. The Government of Nigeria has observed with grave concern recent statements and actions that amount to a threat of aggression and possible violation of our territorial integrity. We remind all States that any such threat or use of force contravenes Article 2(4) of the Ch...

Kebbi’s 3 a.m. Withdrawal Shows Why President Tinubu’s Security Reforms Can’t Wait

When Governor Nasir Idris of Kebbi State revealed that security personnel deployed to vulnerable communities were withdrawn at 3:00 a.m.—just 45 minutes before an attack—Nigerians reacted with shock, anger, and a single question that refuses to disappear: Who gave the withdrawal order? It is a fair question. It is also one that may take time, investigation, and institutional honesty to answer. But the Kebbi incident exposes a deeper truth about security management in Nigeria: our command structure is too fragmented for a country battling multi-layered threats. And this, more than anything, validates President Bola Ahmed Tinubu’s push for a centralised, technology-driven, and accountable security coordination model. Nigeria’s security agencies—military, police, DSS, civil defence, intelligence units—operate in parallel lanes with overlapping mandates. State governors, despite bearing the title “Chief Security Officer,” have no legal authority over federal forces. This incoheren...