Skip to main content

Edge's News: Mum 'throws girl, 3, into bear cage at zoo in front of horrified visitors'

A mum has been arrested after a three-year-old girl was flung 16ft into a brown bear’s cage at a zoo.

Keepers and spectators looked on in horror as the huge animal went to investigate the child - but incredibly did not attack her.


The bear - named Zuzu - went up close and sniffed the little girl, but then wandered away, and was quickly enticed into an internal part of the cage so staff could rescue the child, said witnesses.


The little girl's mum now faces an attempted murder charge after the shocking ordeal.


Witnesses had tried to stop her throwing the child into the enclosure, a spokesman for the zoo in Tashkent, Uzbekistan, said.


He stated: “A young woman threw a little girl down into a brown bear’s enclosure, in front of all the visitors.


“It was completely unclear what her motive was.

“‘Both the visitors and the staff of the zoo were trying to stop her - but failed.”


She said: "We are scared to even think how this would end if the bear were to react at the toddler as its prey.


“Zuzu, a male Caucasian Brown Bear was watching the woman, who threw the little one over a metal fence.


“She fell into a trench under the fence.


“Zuzu got slowly stood up, slowly got down the trench, walked towards the girl, sniffed her - and walked back.”


The mother - unnamed - has been detained and faces a minimum of 15 years in prison, say reports.


The girl suffered concussion, head cuts and bruises injuries from her fall “but not a single trace of wounds from the bear’s fangs or claws.”


She was also suffering “light shock”.


A picture showed her at the Republican Centre for Emergency Medicine in Tashkent.

"She was diagnosed with a concussion, caused by her falling from a height of five metres, and an open wound on her head.


"Currently her state is normal, but she remains under constant observation."

A criminal case for attempted murder has been initiated against the girl's mother.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The FCT Minister–Soldier Standoff: A Test of Civil Authority and the Rule of Law

On November 11, 2025, Nigerians watched in disbelief as a video surfaced showing a tense confrontation between the Minister of the Federal Capital Territory, Nyesom Wike, and a group of armed soldiers who blocked his convoy from accessing a disputed piece of land in Gaduwa, Abuja. The incident, brief but dramatic, was more than a moment of political theatre. It struck at the heart of a much bigger issue — the place of the military in a democracy, and the sanctity of civilian authority under the Nigerian Constitution. The Legal Position: Who Was Right? The Minister’s Authority Under Section 302 of the 1999 Constitution and the FCT Act , the Minister of the Federal Capital Territory exercises the executive powers of the President within Abuja. That means the Minister is not just a political appointee — he represents federal executive authority . His duties include overseeing land allocation, urban planning, and the enforcement of development control through the Federal Capital T...

Nigeria: On the Right of Self-Defence and Protection of National Sovereignty

The Federal Republic of Nigeria reaffirms its unwavering commitment to the purposes and principles of the Charter of the United Nations, in particular the maintenance of international peace and security, the respect for the sovereignty and political independence of all States, and the peaceful settlement of disputes. Nigeria is a sovereign and independent nation. Our Constitution vests sovereignty in the people of Nigeria and mandates the Government to protect the territorial integrity and independence of our country. This sovereignty—recognised under international law and reaffirmed by our membership in the United Nations, the African Union, and the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS)—is inviolable. The Government of Nigeria has observed with grave concern recent statements and actions that amount to a threat of aggression and possible violation of our territorial integrity. We remind all States that any such threat or use of force contravenes Article 2(4) of the Ch...

Kebbi’s 3 a.m. Withdrawal Shows Why President Tinubu’s Security Reforms Can’t Wait

When Governor Nasir Idris of Kebbi State revealed that security personnel deployed to vulnerable communities were withdrawn at 3:00 a.m.—just 45 minutes before an attack—Nigerians reacted with shock, anger, and a single question that refuses to disappear: Who gave the withdrawal order? It is a fair question. It is also one that may take time, investigation, and institutional honesty to answer. But the Kebbi incident exposes a deeper truth about security management in Nigeria: our command structure is too fragmented for a country battling multi-layered threats. And this, more than anything, validates President Bola Ahmed Tinubu’s push for a centralised, technology-driven, and accountable security coordination model. Nigeria’s security agencies—military, police, DSS, civil defence, intelligence units—operate in parallel lanes with overlapping mandates. State governors, despite bearing the title “Chief Security Officer,” have no legal authority over federal forces. This incoheren...