Skip to main content

Edge's News: United Kingdom New covid rules and restrictions spells SEGREGATION....... 😡😡😡😡

UK Foreign Secretary, Why is Britain discriminating against passengers who receive their Pfizer/AZ/Moderna jabs in Africa, South America, much of Asia, etc?

The most annoying take on this is anti-vaxxers claiming that this says anything about vaccine efficacy … this is literally just the same old racism we’ve come to expect


Middle East: Passengers who were fully-vaccinated (Pfizer/Moderna/AZ/J&J) *IN* either Bahrain, Qatar, Kuwait, and Saudi Arabia will be “recognised” by England as fully-vaccinated travellers, and therefore have no quarantine effective Oct 4.


Passengers who were fully-vaccinated with the same vaccines but *IN* the UAE, Oman, Jordan, Lebanon, Syria, Iran and Iraq and elsewhere across the region are not currently “recognised” and passengers are categorised as “unvaccinated” by UK government = quarantine 


I fear for the impact of the new UK travel policy. New UK travel policy regarding Covid-19 vaccination could reinforce existing fears of many in Africa that the vaccines offered (by the UK) in African countries cannot be trusted. Concerning!


It’s concerning that UK’s policy of treating anyone who is vaccinated anywhere on the continent of Africa as “unvaccinated” is now adding to vaccine hesitancy/doubts in vaccines donated by Britain in the first place UK government should come forward and explain the policy ASAP, It’s especially unusual given many of these vaccines were donated by UK, EU & US through COVAX?


While this hasn’t been given much (if any) media attention in UK given the distraction of “Amber list gone” (it hasn’t) or “travel policy simplified” (not true) — this has not gone by unnoticed in multiple nationsExpecting an African nation President to address this tomorrow 


One senior aviation official in Rwanda  joins others in telling me they expect UK government to explain why their passengers, fully vaccinated with Pfizer/AZ/etc, are categorised by UK as “unvaccinated” and so face quarantine…purely because they received their shots in Africa.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The FCT Minister–Soldier Standoff: A Test of Civil Authority and the Rule of Law

On November 11, 2025, Nigerians watched in disbelief as a video surfaced showing a tense confrontation between the Minister of the Federal Capital Territory, Nyesom Wike, and a group of armed soldiers who blocked his convoy from accessing a disputed piece of land in Gaduwa, Abuja. The incident, brief but dramatic, was more than a moment of political theatre. It struck at the heart of a much bigger issue — the place of the military in a democracy, and the sanctity of civilian authority under the Nigerian Constitution. The Legal Position: Who Was Right? The Minister’s Authority Under Section 302 of the 1999 Constitution and the FCT Act , the Minister of the Federal Capital Territory exercises the executive powers of the President within Abuja. That means the Minister is not just a political appointee — he represents federal executive authority . His duties include overseeing land allocation, urban planning, and the enforcement of development control through the Federal Capital T...

Nigeria: On the Right of Self-Defence and Protection of National Sovereignty

The Federal Republic of Nigeria reaffirms its unwavering commitment to the purposes and principles of the Charter of the United Nations, in particular the maintenance of international peace and security, the respect for the sovereignty and political independence of all States, and the peaceful settlement of disputes. Nigeria is a sovereign and independent nation. Our Constitution vests sovereignty in the people of Nigeria and mandates the Government to protect the territorial integrity and independence of our country. This sovereignty—recognised under international law and reaffirmed by our membership in the United Nations, the African Union, and the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS)—is inviolable. The Government of Nigeria has observed with grave concern recent statements and actions that amount to a threat of aggression and possible violation of our territorial integrity. We remind all States that any such threat or use of force contravenes Article 2(4) of the Ch...

Kebbi’s 3 a.m. Withdrawal Shows Why President Tinubu’s Security Reforms Can’t Wait

When Governor Nasir Idris of Kebbi State revealed that security personnel deployed to vulnerable communities were withdrawn at 3:00 a.m.—just 45 minutes before an attack—Nigerians reacted with shock, anger, and a single question that refuses to disappear: Who gave the withdrawal order? It is a fair question. It is also one that may take time, investigation, and institutional honesty to answer. But the Kebbi incident exposes a deeper truth about security management in Nigeria: our command structure is too fragmented for a country battling multi-layered threats. And this, more than anything, validates President Bola Ahmed Tinubu’s push for a centralised, technology-driven, and accountable security coordination model. Nigeria’s security agencies—military, police, DSS, civil defence, intelligence units—operate in parallel lanes with overlapping mandates. State governors, despite bearing the title “Chief Security Officer,” have no legal authority over federal forces. This incoheren...