Edge's News: Paul Okoye vs Anita Okoye: Divorce Update....Anita Okoye alleged demands!!!!

According inside sources things have gone out of control for a while now, as Anita Okoye allegedly made some unwholesome demands from her husband Paul Okoye, the demands are:

1. She wanted Psquare to break up so that Paul can be on her own, she got it.

2. She asked Paul to make her a director in the new company (RudeBoy records), he agreed.

3. She asked Paul to fire his manager and replace him with her younger brother who studied music at Unilag and also had a diploma in Business Management. He refused.

4. She requested that she wants to be traveling with Paul to all his events & shows, he refused.

5. She heard that Psquare are planning to get back together and told Paul not to attend any reconciliation meeting, he ignored her.

6. She then decided to starve him.of sex for 5 months just to make him know she is upset. Paul told Jude's wife to beg her but Anita stood her grounds. So Paul decided to get a girlfriend who he rented a house for her ikoyi. And he stopped begging her for sex.

7. In December, she refused to allow her kids to attend the yearly Okoye Xmas party at Jude's house which Jude's wife condemned.

8. In March, she requested that she wanted to take the kids for holiday in the US where her sister is based. Paul told her to wait till August but she refused. When Paul went for a show in UK in April, she took the kids and fled to the USA without his permission.

9. In June, Paul paid a surprise visit to her sister's place in USA only to discover she wasn't staying there. She was in another State ( Utah ) with her ex- boyfriend, one Peterside from the same village with her in Rivers State.

10. Paul asked to see the kids, but she refused so he left & returned to Nigeria.

11. She was expecting him to file for divorce, but after waiting for months and not hearing him make any move, she decided to file it herself.

Paul has never ever hit her. He was giving her 3 million a month as upkeep.

Comments

The FCT Minister–Soldier Standoff: A Test of Civil Authority and the Rule of Law

On November 11, 2025, Nigerians watched in disbelief as a video surfaced showing a tense confrontation between the Minister of the Federal Capital Territory, Nyesom Wike, and a group of armed soldiers who blocked his convoy from accessing a disputed piece of land in Gaduwa, Abuja. The incident, brief but dramatic, was more than a moment of political theatre. It struck at the heart of a much bigger issue — the place of the military in a democracy, and the sanctity of civilian authority under the Nigerian Constitution. The Legal Position: Who Was Right? The Minister’s Authority Under Section 302 of the 1999 Constitution and the FCT Act , the Minister of the Federal Capital Territory exercises the executive powers of the President within Abuja. That means the Minister is not just a political appointee — he represents federal executive authority . His duties include overseeing land allocation, urban planning, and the enforcement of development control through the Federal Capital T...

Nigeria: On the Right of Self-Defence and Protection of National Sovereignty

The Federal Republic of Nigeria reaffirms its unwavering commitment to the purposes and principles of the Charter of the United Nations, in particular the maintenance of international peace and security, the respect for the sovereignty and political independence of all States, and the peaceful settlement of disputes. Nigeria is a sovereign and independent nation. Our Constitution vests sovereignty in the people of Nigeria and mandates the Government to protect the territorial integrity and independence of our country. This sovereignty—recognised under international law and reaffirmed by our membership in the United Nations, the African Union, and the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS)—is inviolable. The Government of Nigeria has observed with grave concern recent statements and actions that amount to a threat of aggression and possible violation of our territorial integrity. We remind all States that any such threat or use of force contravenes Article 2(4) of the Ch...

Kebbi’s 3 a.m. Withdrawal Shows Why President Tinubu’s Security Reforms Can’t Wait

When Governor Nasir Idris of Kebbi State revealed that security personnel deployed to vulnerable communities were withdrawn at 3:00 a.m.—just 45 minutes before an attack—Nigerians reacted with shock, anger, and a single question that refuses to disappear: Who gave the withdrawal order? It is a fair question. It is also one that may take time, investigation, and institutional honesty to answer. But the Kebbi incident exposes a deeper truth about security management in Nigeria: our command structure is too fragmented for a country battling multi-layered threats. And this, more than anything, validates President Bola Ahmed Tinubu’s push for a centralised, technology-driven, and accountable security coordination model. Nigeria’s security agencies—military, police, DSS, civil defence, intelligence units—operate in parallel lanes with overlapping mandates. State governors, despite bearing the title “Chief Security Officer,” have no legal authority over federal forces. This incoheren...

Edge Of The World

Search This Blog