Skip to main content

TotalEnergies invests $60 billion in Nigeria

TotalEnergies has invested over $60 billion in exploration and other projects in Nigeria, as it plays a significant economic and social role in the country, contributing about 15% of the nation’s production. This was disclosed by Victor Bamidele, Deputy Managing Director, Deepwater District, TotalEnergies, at the Nigeria Oil and Gas (NOG) Conference in Abuja, on Monday.


“TotalEnergies, as we are now called, has been in Africa for more than 80 years, and has been working in exploration activities in Nigeria for over 60 years. In the upstream sector, we have a diversified portfolio in Nigeria with facilities spanning onshore, deep waters and LNG. We are very proud of our strong partnership with the Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation (NNPC) and various partners over the years.


Our upstream branch plays a significant economic and social role in Nigeria contributing about 15% of the country’s production. Nigeria, as one of our core areas of activities, is also crucial to TotalEnergies group accounting for 12% of equity production. In the past few years, TotalEnergies has invested approximately 10 billion in the country through executing development projects,” Bamidele said.


He added that over the years the company’s activities have helped in creating jobs and many other benefits in spite of the challenging environment it operates. He noted that EGINA Floating Production Storage and Offloading vessels (FPSO) was completed in 2018 and the company is currently investing in the development of the IKIKE Project.


EGINA was developed in 2013 by Total after the NOGIC act was established. It remains the company’s third-biggest FPSO project that had boosted local content. IKIKE development field is with OML 99, 20 kilometres offshore, and is being developed as a satellite terminal in spite of its size and content objective. The project is expected to facilitate entry-level training for 80 geoscience students in the country.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The FCT Minister–Soldier Standoff: A Test of Civil Authority and the Rule of Law

On November 11, 2025, Nigerians watched in disbelief as a video surfaced showing a tense confrontation between the Minister of the Federal Capital Territory, Nyesom Wike, and a group of armed soldiers who blocked his convoy from accessing a disputed piece of land in Gaduwa, Abuja. The incident, brief but dramatic, was more than a moment of political theatre. It struck at the heart of a much bigger issue — the place of the military in a democracy, and the sanctity of civilian authority under the Nigerian Constitution. The Legal Position: Who Was Right? The Minister’s Authority Under Section 302 of the 1999 Constitution and the FCT Act , the Minister of the Federal Capital Territory exercises the executive powers of the President within Abuja. That means the Minister is not just a political appointee — he represents federal executive authority . His duties include overseeing land allocation, urban planning, and the enforcement of development control through the Federal Capital T...

Nigeria: On the Right of Self-Defence and Protection of National Sovereignty

The Federal Republic of Nigeria reaffirms its unwavering commitment to the purposes and principles of the Charter of the United Nations, in particular the maintenance of international peace and security, the respect for the sovereignty and political independence of all States, and the peaceful settlement of disputes. Nigeria is a sovereign and independent nation. Our Constitution vests sovereignty in the people of Nigeria and mandates the Government to protect the territorial integrity and independence of our country. This sovereignty—recognised under international law and reaffirmed by our membership in the United Nations, the African Union, and the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS)—is inviolable. The Government of Nigeria has observed with grave concern recent statements and actions that amount to a threat of aggression and possible violation of our territorial integrity. We remind all States that any such threat or use of force contravenes Article 2(4) of the Ch...

Kebbi’s 3 a.m. Withdrawal Shows Why President Tinubu’s Security Reforms Can’t Wait

When Governor Nasir Idris of Kebbi State revealed that security personnel deployed to vulnerable communities were withdrawn at 3:00 a.m.—just 45 minutes before an attack—Nigerians reacted with shock, anger, and a single question that refuses to disappear: Who gave the withdrawal order? It is a fair question. It is also one that may take time, investigation, and institutional honesty to answer. But the Kebbi incident exposes a deeper truth about security management in Nigeria: our command structure is too fragmented for a country battling multi-layered threats. And this, more than anything, validates President Bola Ahmed Tinubu’s push for a centralised, technology-driven, and accountable security coordination model. Nigeria’s security agencies—military, police, DSS, civil defence, intelligence units—operate in parallel lanes with overlapping mandates. State governors, despite bearing the title “Chief Security Officer,” have no legal authority over federal forces. This incoheren...